Contents
Volume 72 Number 4 2008
ISSN: 0022-0183 eISSN: 1740-5580
Show list with all abstracts • Links to other issues
Opinion
Order, Order!
David Kirk
259
DOI: 1350/jcla.2008.72.4.502
Criminal Law
Laura McGowan
262
DOI: 1350/jcla.2008.72.4.503
Divisional Court
Racially Aggravated Public Order Offence: Sufficiency of Partial Racial Hostility
Keywords: Racially aggravated; Public order; Partial racial hostility;Causing harassment, alarm or distress 265
DOI: 1350/jcla.2008.72.4.504
Court of Appeal
Outraging Public Decency
Keywords: Outraging public decency; Public element; 'Two-person' rule;Knuller v DPP; Shaw v DPP 268
DOI: 1350/jcla.2008.72.4.505
House of Lords
Police Officers and CPS Solicitors Serving on Juries: The Appearance of Bias
Keywords: Unconscious and apparent bias; Jurors; Impartiality of jury;Right to fair trial; Juries including police officers and CPS solicitors 283
DOI: 1350/jcla.2008.72.4.507
Comments
The Mandatory Life Sentence for Murder: Is It Time for Discretion?
Keywords: Homicide law reform; Sentencing for murder; Moral culpability;Reckles murder; Contextual evaluation for killing
Tenney Cotton
288
DOI: 1350/jcla.2008.72.4.510
The 'Neck or Nothing': Alternative Verdicts in Sexual Offences
Keywords: Sexual offences; Alternative verdicts; R v J (2004); Change of law cases; Prosecution of alternative charges
Andrew Beetham
298
DOI: 1350/jcla.2008.72.4.511
Articles
Codifying the Law on Evidential Burdens
Keywords: Burden of proof; Lambert; Criminal Codes; Misuse of drugs; Judicial Studies Board specimen directions
Richard Glover
305
DOI: 1350/jcla.2008.72.4.512
[close]
JCL 72 (2008) 305
Codifying the Law on Evidential Burdens
Richard Glover
This article examines the concept of the evidential burden and argues that the decision in R v Malinina illustrates that the concept of the evidential burden is in desperate need of clarification. It will be contended that, ultimately, codification would be the best means of achieving that end.
[close]
Recklessness–the Continuing Search for a Definition
Keywords: Mens rea; Recklessness; Culpability; Subjective and objective; Advertence to risk
Cath Crosby
313
DOI: 1350/jcla.2008.72.4.513
[close]
JCL 72 (2008) 313
Recklessness–the Continuing Search for a Definition
Cath Crosby
This article examines the different approaches to determining recklessness in the criminal law and the advantages and disadvantages of each will be explored in relation to issues of moral culpability. Whilst a subjective definition of recklessness might seem attractive it fails to catch all those who are morally blameworthy. In contrast, a purely objective interpretation can lead to injustice in circumstances where the defendant lacked the capacity to foresee the risk of harm. It will be argued that recklessness based upon conscious advertence produces too narrow a definition and culpable inadvertence should be encompassed by examining why no thought was given to the risk
[close]
[close]
Links to other issues
Volume 65 (2001) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 66 (2002) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 67 (2003) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 68 (2004) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 69 (2005) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 70 (2006) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 71 (2007) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 72 (2008) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 73 (2009) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 74 (2010) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 75 (2011) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
[close]

