Contents
Volume 71 Number 4 2007
ISSN: 0022-0183 eISSN: 1740-5580
Show list with all abstracts • Links to other issues
Index
iii
Cases
iv
Opinion
The legality of assaulting ideas
Gary Slapper
279
Criminal Law Legislation Update
Laura McGowan
282
Divisional Court
Malicious Communications Act 1988: human rights
288
Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005: compatibility with Article 11 of the European
Convention on Human Rights
291
Court of Appeal
Recklessness: intoxication and assault
296
Anonymity of witnesses
298
House of Lords
Communications Act 2003: 'grossly offensive' message
301
Racially aggravated offence
304
Private prosecutions; abuse of process
306
Comment
Human rights and the defence of chastisement
Simon Parsons
308
Articles
Distinguishing between murder and manslaughter in practice
Barry Mitchell
318
[close]
JCL 71 (2007) 318
Distinguishing between murder and manslaughter in practice
Barry Mitchell
The Home Office is currently engaged in a review of the homicide law, which includes consideration of the Law Commission’s report Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide, published in November 2006, which recommended three principal offences—first and second degree murder, and a redefined manslaughter. Through an analysis of a sample of murder and manslaughter prosecutions, this article offers some timely evidence of the way in which the law works in practice. In particular, it suggests there is evidence—not mere anecdotes—that occasionally the verdicts reached by the courts do not seem to sit comfortably with the law as stated in books, and that whilst some of these apparent ‘discrepancies’ may be attributed to the vagaries of the jury, it is likely that the way in which those who investigate, prosecute and defend homicide cases also play an important role here.
[close]
Descent into murder: provocation's stricture-the prognosis for women who kill men who abuse them
Susan Edwards
342
[close]
JCL 71 (2007) 342
Descent into murder: provocation's stricture-the prognosis for women who kill men who abuse them
Susan Edwards
This article considers the ruling in Attorney-General for Jersey v Holley and its impact on limiting the ambit of the defence of provocation by restoring to the reasonable person a normative capacity for self-control. In particular, the implications of this limitation on legal outcome in cases where women kill men who abuse them are explored. The inevitable demise of provocation as a defence, which follows from the ruling in Holley, is of particular concern as is the new framework for sentencing in convictions for murder which in removing judicial discretion from the sentencing decision prohibits judges from tempering the harshness of the mandatory sentence. This new murder/sentencing regime will undoubtedly result in injustice, especially in those cases where battered women kill, which, although deserving of mitigation, nevertheless fail to satisfy the strictures of provocation’s requirements post Holley, thereby resulting in an increase in convictions for murder. The Law Commission’s report on Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide recommends a new framework for murder and manslaughter, including a new definition of provocation and also a new direction in the murder sentencing framework. This area of the law is still far from fixed.
[close]
'Surrendering' the fugitive-the European Arrest Warrant and the United Kingdom
Mark Mackarel
362
[close]
JCL 71 (2007) 362
'Surrendering' the fugitive-the European Arrest Warrant and the United Kingdom
Mark Mackarel
This article explains how the European Arrest Warrant forms part of the response to the modern needs of the European Union in dealing with transnational crime and considers the experience of the UK in implementing and using the warrant. The warrant is the first manifestation of the EU policy of mutual recognition in relation to cooperation in criminal matters and in questioning how effectively the UK has put the warrant into operation under the Extradition Act 2003, the article compares the analyses of the European Commission, Eurojust and the House of Lords. Finally, the approach to interpretation taken by the courts to cases coming before them concerning the warrant under the 2003 Act is examined.
[close]
[close]
Links to other issues
Volume 65 (2001) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 66 (2002) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 67 (2003) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 68 (2004) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 69 (2005) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 70 (2006) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 71 (2007) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 72 (2008) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
[close]

