Contents

Volume 70 Number 6 2006
ISSN: 0022-0183  eISSN: 1740-5580

Show list with all abstracts  •  Links to other issues

Index      iii

Cases      v

Opinion

Evidence in 'No-Body' Murder Trials
James Morton      459

Criminal Law Legislation Update
Sally Ireland      463

Divisional Court

Computer Misuse: Denial-of-service Attacks
Stefan Fafinski      474

European Court of Human Rights

Search Warrant: Compatibility with Articles 8 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Andrew Roberts      479

German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof—BGH), 4th Criminal Senate

Homicide and Non-fatal Offences: Mens Rea
Michael Bohlander      482

Supreme Court of the Netherlands, Criminal Division (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, Strafkamer)

HIV Transmission: Criminalisation
Willemijn van Kouwen and Karin Bruinenberg      485

Supreme Court of Kosovo, Criminal Division (Gjykata Supreme E Kosovës, Kolegji Penal)

Request for Protection of Legality: Application of the Most Favourable Law
Haki Demolli      490

Comment

Legitimate Sport' or Criminal Assault? What Are the Roles of the Rules and the Rulemakers in Determining Criminal Liability for Violence on the Sports Field?
Ben Livings      495

Articles

Football Banning Orders: Analysing their Use in Court
Mark James and Geoff Pearson      509

ABSTRACT

[close]

JCL 70 (2006) 509

Football Banning Orders: Analysing their Use in Court
Mark James and Geoff Pearson

In the months prior to the 2006 FIFA World Cup in Germany, the government funded a number of targeted policing operations aimed at securing Football Banning Orders against known or suspected football hooligans. This article is based on court observations and associated interviews carried out in early 2006 in and around Manchester. It evaluates the application process, the legal tests applied and the quality of the evidence relied on by courts when determining whether the imposition of a Football Banning Order is necessary to prevent future football-related disorder being committed by the respondent. In particular, the analysis focuses on whether the use of a civil procedure can continue to be justified in the light of the punitive length of and conditions attached to these Orders, whether the correct standard of proof is being applied by the court at all stages of the application and whether policing tactics are focused too narrowly on the securing of Football Banning Orders.

[close]

Strict Criminal Liability: A Violation of the Convention?
Solomon E. Salako      531

ABSTRACT

[close]

JCL 70 (2006) 531

Strict Criminal Liability: A Violation of the Convention?
Solomon E. Salako

Since its inception in the late 19th century, strict criminal liability has been used to grapple with regulatory offences. The object of this article is to show that in most cases and in spite of the utilitarian arguments advanced for its retention, strict criminal liability violates Convention rights and that civil sanctions would offer equivalent possibility of enforcing regulatory offences.

[close]

Book Reviews

Damian Warburton      550

[close]

Links to other issues

Volume 65 (2001) :   1   2   3   4   5   6

Volume 66 (2002) :   1   2   3   4   5   6

Volume 67 (2003) :   1   2   3   4   5   6

Volume 68 (2004) :   1   2   3   4   5   6

Volume 69 (2005) :   1   2   3   4   5   6

Volume 70 (2006) :   1   2   3   4   5   6

Volume 71 (2007) :   1   2   3   4   5   6

Volume 72 (2008) :   1   2   3   4   5   6

Volume 73 (2009) :   1   2   3   4   6

Volume 74 (2010) :   1   2   3   4

[close]


Home | Agents | Authors/researchers | Librarians | Advertising | Contact Vathek | Contents lists and abstracts | Individual subscriptions | Institutional Prices | Law links | Permissions | Sample copies | Search | Site map | Manuscript submission and style |

© Vathek Publishing :: site design by oxogen

 law journals for academics and practitioners

you are here:  Authors/researchers » JCL » Contents lists and abstracts

JCL: journal masthead