Contents
Volume 70 Number 6 2006
ISSN: 0022-0183 eISSN: 1740-5580
Show list with all abstracts • Links to other issues
Index
iii
Cases
v
Opinion
Evidence in 'No-Body' Murder Trials
James Morton
459
Criminal Law Legislation Update
Sally Ireland
463
Divisional Court
Computer Misuse: Denial-of-service Attacks
Stefan Fafinski
474
European Court of Human Rights
Search Warrant: Compatibility with Articles 8 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Andrew Roberts
479
German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof—BGH), 4th Criminal Senate
Homicide and Non-fatal Offences: Mens Rea
Michael Bohlander
482
Supreme Court of the Netherlands, Criminal Division (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden, Strafkamer)
HIV Transmission: Criminalisation
Willemijn van Kouwen and Karin Bruinenberg
485
Supreme Court of Kosovo, Criminal Division (Gjykata Supreme E Kosovës, Kolegji Penal)
Request for Protection of Legality: Application of the Most Favourable Law
Haki Demolli
490
Comment
Legitimate Sport' or Criminal Assault? What Are the Roles of the Rules and the Rulemakers in Determining Criminal Liability for Violence on the Sports Field?
Ben Livings
495
Articles
Football Banning Orders: Analysing their Use in Court
Mark James and Geoff Pearson
509
[close]
JCL 70 (2006) 509
Football Banning Orders: Analysing their Use in Court
Mark James and Geoff Pearson
In the months prior to the 2006 FIFA World Cup in Germany, the government funded a number of targeted policing operations aimed at securing Football Banning Orders against known or suspected football hooligans. This article is based on court observations and associated interviews carried out in early 2006 in and around Manchester. It evaluates the application process, the legal tests applied and the quality of the evidence relied on by courts when determining whether the imposition of a Football Banning Order is necessary to prevent future football-related disorder being committed by the respondent. In particular, the analysis focuses on whether the use of a civil procedure can continue to be justified in the light of the punitive length of and conditions attached to these Orders, whether the correct standard of proof is being applied by the court at all stages of the application and whether policing tactics are focused too narrowly on the securing of Football Banning Orders.
[close]
Strict Criminal Liability: A Violation of the Convention?
Solomon E. Salako
531
[close]
JCL 70 (2006) 531
Strict Criminal Liability: A Violation of the Convention?
Solomon E. Salako
Since its inception in the late 19th century, strict criminal liability has been used to grapple with regulatory offences. The object of this article is to show that in most cases and in spite of the utilitarian arguments advanced for its retention, strict criminal liability violates Convention rights and that civil sanctions would offer equivalent possibility of enforcing regulatory offences.
[close]
Book Reviews
Damian Warburton
550
[close]
Links to other issues
Volume 65 (2001) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 66 (2002) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 67 (2003) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 68 (2004) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 69 (2005) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 70 (2006) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 71 (2007) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 72 (2008) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
[close]

