Contents
Volume 69 Number 4 2005
ISSN: 0022-0183 eISSN: 1740-5580
Show list with all abstracts • Links to other issues
Index
iii
Cases
v
Opinion
Pleas please me
James Morton
277
Criminal Law Legislation Update
Sally Ireland
280
Divisional Court
Theft Act 1968, s. 15A: obtaining money transfer by deception
287
Unlawful sexual intercourse: compatibility with Articles 6, 8 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights
292
European Convention on Human Rights: extra-territorial application
295
Press freedom: injunctions binding the world
302
Court of Appeal
Public interest immunity
306
Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000; Sex Offenders Act 1997: definition of 'sexual offence'
310
House of Lords
Confessions; duress
315
Police: duty of care to victims and witnesses
318
Privy Council
Barbados: felony murder rule; mandatory sentences
322
Comment
Prosecution appeals against acquittals in bench trials-the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and the Government's fear of the dark
Michael Bohlander
326
Articles
Expert testimony in the dock
Adam Wilson
330
[close]
JCL 69 (2005) 330
Expert testimony in the dock
Adam Wilson
This article focuses predominantly on the recent miscarriages of justice in the cases of Angela Cannings and Sally Clark. The article identifies possible causes of error in trials involving expert testimony. It is suggested that admission of scientific evidence may inevitably elicit such miscarriages of justice. In order to reduce their frequency, however, experts need training in both scientific and forensic methodology. The science community must also ensure vigilance against scientific dogma. The cases show that responsibility does not lie solely at the feet of expert witnesses. Advocates need training in how to deal with expert testimony. Finally, the use of the jury in complex scientific trials is considered and approved.
[close]
Should the law of theft extend to information?
Anna Louise Christie
349
[close]
JCL 69 (2005) 349
Should the law of theft extend to information?
Anna Louise Christie
This article discusses whether the criminal offence of theft should extend to include information or should remain limited to corporeal property. It considers the inherent problems in satisfying the requisite elements of the offence of theft in both Scots law and English law and assesses whether information is classifiable as property for the purposes of theft. The arguments for and against the proposition that information should be capable of being stolen are examined and a case for more comprehensive protection of information through criminal law is put forward. The article finally comments on the probability of legislative reform to remove the legal obstacles and compares the UK position to that of other jurisdictions.
[close]
Book Review
361
[close]
Links to other issues
Volume 65 (2001) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 66 (2002) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 67 (2003) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 68 (2004) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 69 (2005) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 70 (2006) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 71 (2007) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
Volume 72 (2008) : 1 2 3 4 5 6
[close]

