Contents
Volume 13 Number 4 2009
ISSN: 1365-7127 eISSN: 1740-5572
Show list with all abstracts • Links to other issues
Editorial
Jenny McEwan
267
Article
Reasonable doubt in credibility contests: sexual assault and sexual equality
Keywords: Sexual assault trials; Burden of proof; Credibility contests; Reasonable doubt; Equality rights
Christine Boyle
269
[close]
(2009) 13 E & P 269
Reasonable doubt in credibility contests: sexual assault and sexual equality
Christine Boyle
Sexual assault prosecutions present particular challenges in making credibility determinations in ¿he said/she said¿ cases. An analysis of Canadian law illustrates how attempts to avoid the ¿either/or¿ error can be vulnerable to a critique that the understanding of reasonable doubt in such cases is inconsistent with sex equality. The possible ways in which accused persons may be given the benefit of a less than reasonable doubt, and the resulting implications for both sex equality and judicial impartiality, are discussed in this article. A return to basic principles is suggested.
[close]
The evidential quality of victim personal statements and family impact statements
Keywords: Victims; Sentencing; Victims' advocates; Evidence; Statements
Ian Edwards
293
[close]
(2009) 13 E & P 293
The evidential quality of victim personal statements and family impact statements
Ian Edwards
Victim personal statements (VPS) were introduced by the UK government in 2001 and family impact statements (FIS) in 2007. This article explores the evidential quality that VPS/FIS have at sentencing. First, the article considers the notion of procedural fairness for offenders and the relationship between it and the rationales for VPS/FIS. Secondly, as a case study, it explores the introduction of victim impact statements (VIS) in South Australia where the evidential quality of VIS was a central issue during parliamentary debate on the introduction of victims¿ rights to present orally their VIS. Thirdly, it evaluates the current law relating to the admissibility and evidential quality of VPS/FIS in English law. It is argued that incorporating victims¿ information in sentencing has the potential to undermine key principles of procedural fairness, but VPS/FIS pose little threat to the fair treatment of offenders in light of judicial guidance.
[close]
Letter to the Editor
Stephen Mason
321
Case Note
Horncastle v R: statements from witnesses absent from trial
Adam Webster
324
Flores-Figueroa v United States: US Supreme Court attempts to clarify mens rea
Raymond J. Toney
330
The service of witness statements and litigation privilege: ACCC v Cadbury
Jason Pobjoy
336
Case Commentary
Rosemary Pattenden
342
Noticeboard 362
Book Review
Déirdre Dwyer: The Judicial Assessment of Expert Evidence
Tony Ward
365

