Contents

Volume 13 Number 4 2009
ISSN: 1365-7127  eISSN: 1740-5572

Show list with all abstracts  •  Links to other issues

Editorial

Jenny McEwan      267

Article

Reasonable doubt in credibility contests: sexual assault and sexual equality
Keywords: Sexual assault trials; Burden of proof; Credibility contests; Reasonable doubt; Equality rights
Christine Boyle      269

ABSTRACT

[close]

(2009) 13 E & P 269

Reasonable doubt in credibility contests: sexual assault and sexual equality
Christine Boyle

Sexual assault prosecutions present particular challenges in making credibility determinations in ¿he said/she said¿ cases. An analysis of Canadian law illustrates how attempts to avoid the ¿either/or¿ error can be vulnerable to a critique that the understanding of reasonable doubt in such cases is inconsistent with sex equality. The possible ways in which accused persons may be given the benefit of a less than reasonable doubt, and the resulting implications for both sex equality and judicial impartiality, are discussed in this article. A return to basic principles is suggested.

[close]

The evidential quality of victim personal statements and family impact statements
Keywords: Victims; Sentencing; Victims' advocates; Evidence; Statements
Ian Edwards      293

ABSTRACT

[close]

(2009) 13 E & P 293

The evidential quality of victim personal statements and family impact statements
Ian Edwards

Victim personal statements (VPS) were introduced by the UK government in 2001 and family impact statements (FIS) in 2007. This article explores the evidential quality that VPS/FIS have at sentencing. First, the article considers the notion of procedural fairness for offenders and the relationship between it and the rationales for VPS/FIS. Secondly, as a case study, it explores the introduction of victim impact statements (VIS) in South Australia where the evidential quality of VIS was a central issue during parliamentary debate on the introduction of victims¿ rights to present orally their VIS. Thirdly, it evaluates the current law relating to the admissibility and evidential quality of VPS/FIS in English law. It is argued that incorporating victims¿ information in sentencing has the potential to undermine key principles of procedural fairness, but VPS/FIS pose little threat to the fair treatment of offenders in light of judicial guidance.

[close]

Letter to the Editor

Stephen Mason      321

Case Note

Horncastle v R: statements from witnesses absent from trial
Adam Webster      324

Flores-Figueroa v United States: US Supreme Court attempts to clarify mens rea
Raymond J. Toney      330

The service of witness statements and litigation privilege: ACCC v Cadbury
Jason Pobjoy      336

Case Commentary

Rosemary Pattenden      342

Noticeboard     362

Book Review

Déirdre Dwyer: The Judicial Assessment of Expert Evidence
Tony Ward      365

[close]

Links to other issues

Volume 5 (2001) :   1   2   3   4

Volume 6 (2002) :   1   2   3   4

Volume 7 (2003) :   1   2   3   4

Volume 8 (2004) :   1   2   3   4

Volume 9 (2005) :   1   2   3   4

Volume 10 (2006) :   1   2   3   4

Volume 11 (2007) :   1   2   3   4

Volume 12 (2008) :   1   2   3   4

Volume 13 (2009) :   1   2   3   4

Volume 14 (2010) :   1

[close]


Home | Agents | Authors/researchers | Librarians | Advertising | Contact Vathek | Contents lists and abstracts | Individual subscriptions | Institutional Prices | Law links | Permissions | Sample copies | Search | Site map | Manuscript submission and style |

© Vathek Publishing :: site design by oxogen

 law journals for academics and practitioners

you are here:  Authors/researchers » IJEP » Contents lists and abstracts

IJEP: journal masthead