Contents
Volume 14 Number 1 2010
ISSN: 1365-7127 eISSN: 1740-5572
Show list with all abstracts • Links to other issues
Article
Need verdicts come in pairs?
Keywords: Conviction; Acquittal; Standard of proof; Beyond reasonable doubt; Verdict of not proven
Larry Laudan
1
DOI: doi:10.1350/ijep.2010.14.1.338
[close]
(2010) 14 E & P 1
Need verdicts come in pairs?
Larry Laudan
Given the high standard of proof that operates in criminal cases, the meaning of an acquittal is highly ambiguous. This disadvantages the genuinely innocent defendant and also citizens who are unsure of the significance of any given ¿Not Guilty¿ verdict. The finders of fact may have taken any one of a wide range of views in relation to the defendant¿s guilt, and it is argued that the two extremes of acquittal and conviction take insufficient account of this.
[close]
From ad hoc to hybrid¿the rules and regulations governing reception of expert evidence at the International Criminal Court
Keywords: International Criminal Court; Expert evidence; Uncertainty in rules for reception; Need for Code of Conduct; Comparisons between international and domestic criminal procedure
Roger Derham and Nicole Derham
25
DOI: doi:10.1350/ijep.2010.14.1.339
[close]
(2010) 14 E & P 25
From ad hoc to hybrid¿the rules and regulations governing reception of expert evidence at the International Criminal Court
Roger Derham and Nicole Derham
The International Criminal Court has been established as a permanent forum to try only the gravest of crimes. Given the unique treaty-sanctioned amalgamation of common law and civil law procedures of the Court, this article examines the evidentiary provisions for the reception of expert opinion at pre-trial, trial and reparation stages. It discusses some of the recent decisions concerning expert witness testimony and considers whether this jurisprudence has evolved sufficiently to overcome many of the perceived shortcomings of expert witness involvement in the ad hoc tribunals. The article looks to recent developments in national civil and criminal law procedures concerning expert testimony and proposes the adoption of a specific definition of what the ICC actually considers an expert or expert witness to be, as well as a Code of Conduct for such witnesses. In conclusion the article proposes a minimal-set of procedural modifications thought essential to optimise the use of experts and expert witnesses at the ICC.
[close]
Case note
Eyewitness identification and expert insight: R v Forbes
Keywords: Eyewitness identification; Psychological research; Expert testimony; Sequential line-up; Australia
Andrew Roberts
57
DOI: doi:10.1350/ijep.2010.14.1.340
Case Commentaries
Case Commentaries
Rosemary Pattenden
63
DOI: doi:10.1350/ijep.2010.14.1.341
Noticeboard
Noticeboard
Rosemary Pattenden
85
DOI: doi:10.1350/ijep.2010.14.1.342

